Named ownership
Each substantive guide identifies an author and a legal reviewer. Their profile pages explain the experience and role relevant to that content.
Trust and transparency
How 186 Private writes and reviews public guidance.
These standards apply to our resource centre, legal explainers, tools and profile-led articles.
Primary sources first
We prefer legislation, French government portals, official visa systems, GOV.UK, courts, regulators and Notaires de France. Commercial summaries are not treated as legal authority.
Visible dates
Guides show when they were published, reviewed and scheduled for the next review. Volatile fees, thresholds and procedures receive a shorter review cycle.
Information is not advice
Public content explains issues and process. It does not decide a reader’s eligibility, create a lawyer-client relationship or replace an agreed review of the facts.
Professional boundaries
We identify where a notaire, accountant, tax adviser, immigration specialist or other authorised professional may be required. We do not imply that one adviser covers every regulated role.
Corrections
If a material statement is wrong or out of date, we correct it and update the review date. Readers can report an issue using the contact details below.
Responsible AI
AI may support controlled research or drafting, but published legal content requires human review. Confidential client data is not used to produce public guides.
No ranking shortcuts
We do not publish copied competitor text, fake reviews, doorway pages or repetitive keyword variants. One useful page should answer one coherent search need.
Report a correction
Accuracy improves when questions are visible.
Email ariou@186.legal with the page address, statement and source you believe should be reviewed. This route is for editorial corrections, not confidential legal instructions.